Home > Archive > Chess politics > April 2005 > Fischer-Random vs. One-Minute Chess





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Fischer-Random vs. One-Minute Chess
Ray Gordon

2005-03-28, 5:56 pm

Both are solutions to the "draw death" of chess.

I prefer one-minute chess because I think it only makes sense that as chess
theory advances, the time controls should be shortened, and the public would
love to see pieces flying in a game it can understand.

--
Ray Gordon, Author
http://www.cybersheet.com/easy.html
Seduction Made Easy. Get this book FREE when you buy participating
affiliated books!

http://www.cybersheet.com/library.html
The Seduction Library. Four free books to get you started on your quest to
get laid.

Don't buy anything from experts who won't debate on a free speech forum.


99% Kosher

2005-03-29, 6:20 pm

You're an idiot, a moron, a lunatic, a psycho, a weirdo, and a wacko.
Did I leave anything out?

jamesrynd@aol.com

2005-03-29, 6:20 pm

Was pedophilia mentioned?

99% Kosher

2005-04-01, 6:53 am

You're an idiot, a moron, a lunatic, a psycho, a weirdo, and a wacko.
Did I leave anything out?

jamesrynd@aol.com

2005-04-02, 6:52 am

Was pedophilia mentioned?

FrisbeeŽ

2005-04-07, 6:07 pm

99% Kosher wrote:
quote:

> You're an idiot, a moron, a lunatic, a psycho, a weirdo, and a wacko.
> Did I leave anything out?


Only to whom you were referring.
99% Kosher

2005-04-07, 6:07 pm

You're an idiot, a moron, a lunatic, a psycho, a weirdo, and a wacko.
Did I leave anything out?

Copyright 2003 - 2009 gamesreviews.net Software forum  PC Hardware reviews