Home > Archive > Chess politics > March 2005 > Re: Marinello Case: Affirmation of Michael J. Matsler





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Re: Marinello Case: Affirmation of Michael J. Matsler
Ray Gordon

2005-03-29, 3:56 am

>>Now this is interesting: has a COURT ever called his stuff frivolous?
quote:

>
> Yes, from SEC v Sloan 436 US 103 (1978)
>
> On October 15, 1975, the court dismissed as frivolous all respondent's
> claims, except his allegation that the "tacking" of 10-day summary
> suspension orders for an indefinite period was an abuse of the agency's
> authority and a deprivation of due process.


Didn't Sloan WIN that case in the higher court?

Overturned rulings don't count.


--
Ray Gordon, Author
http://www.cybersheet.com/easy.html
Seduction Made Easy. Get this book FREE when you buy participating
affiliated books!

http://www.cybersheet.com/library.html
The Seduction Library. Four free books to get you started on your quest to
get laid.

Don't buy anything from experts who won't debate on a free speech forum.


Copyright 2003 - 2008 gamesreviews.net Software forum  PC Hardware reviews