| Randy Bauer 2005-03-21, 5:52 pm |
| In article <1111422198.654121.225540@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
chessdon@aol.com says...
quote:
>
>Doom and Gloom said:
>
>Why does the other side not muzzle Sloan?
>
>Freedom of speech.
>
>By the same token, the administration can appoint what committee chairs
>it wants. Stan is co-chair of Finance. If he attacks Board Members it
>creates a hostile working environment. He shouldn't be surprised that
>those he attacks will likely not support him for committee co-chairman.
> But nothing happened because the Board majority want to keep Stan as
>co-chair regardless of his attacks on minority Board members. C'est la
>vie!
>
In recent years, Stan has provided a lot of useful business insight -- and free
professional help -- to the USCF. We need more, not less, of that effort.
I'm all for free speech -- too bad some of it isn't really "free" as it relates
to the costs the USCF has to bear. I'm quite sure that Stan Booz isn't
encouraging the filing of frivilous lawsuits that require the USCF to spend
member dues on attorney fees, for example. I don't know that I can say the same
about other posters on this newsgroup.
Randy Bauer
|