|
| This means if Don doesn't like the truth he can recharactarize it as a
personal attack. Of course it is quite acceptable for Don to make personal
attacks via the vehicle of a board motion.
<chessdon@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1111408335.588911.206530@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
quote:
> Randy Bauer said:
>
> "That said, Stan is free to speak his mind on these newsgroups and is
> no
> different than anybody else. At least he puts his USCF dues money
> where his
> mouth is, which is quite a bit different than others who post nearly as
>
> often (or at least are much more wordy). I have NEVER, EVER seen Stan
> post
> in a way that suggests he is speaking for the executive board. Stan
> speaks
> for Stan, and he has the "give em hell, Harry" approach of Harry
> Truman.
> It's a free country.'
> Randy Bauer
>
> If the above is what you truly believe Randy, explain how this equates
> to your vote on recent Board Motion EB 05-33?
>
> To help here is a copy of that motion:
>
> EB 05-33 (Hanke): The EB will send a letter to the CO-chair of the
> Finance Committee Stan Booz asking him to cease and desist from
> personal attacks on the Internet. PASSED 5 -2. In favor: Bauer, Brady,
> Schultz; Opposed: Shaughnessy; Abstaining: Marinello, Shutt and Hanke.
>
> Reconcile this with what you just said on the Internet - the
> "NEVER-NEVER-GIVE-EM-HELL, HARRY" free country statement ?
>
> But then, only minutes later, you apparently had second
> thoughts, so you made motion EB 05-34. Here is that motion:
>
> EB 05-34 (Bauer) Moved to reconsiderEB 05-33. PASSED 5-2. In Favor:
> Marinello, Shutt, Hanke, Bauer and Shaughnessy. Opposed: Brady and
> Schultz.
>
> Had you changed your mind?
>
> Well no, you voted the same way on EB 05-33 as you did the first time.
> Twice you voted to officially request by letter that Stan cease and
> desist from personal attacks on the Internet.
> Here it is the second time:
>
> EB 05-33 Reconsidered: The EB will send a letter to the CO-chair of the
> Finance Committee Stan Booz asking him to cease and desist from
> personal attacks on the Internet. Failed 3-3-1 In Favor: Schultz, Brady
> and Bauer; Opposed: Marinello, Hanke and Shaughnessy; Abstaining:
> Shutt.
>
> Methinks your voting record here is inconsistent with your
> Never-Never-Give-Em-Hell-Harry posting above.
>
> I'm interested to see how you spin this away but your pretty good at
> this so we shall see.
>
|
|