Home > Archive > Chess politics > March 2005 > Re: The candidacies of George John and others





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Re: The candidacies of George John and others
Randy Bauer

2005-03-13, 5:53 pm


<parrthenon@cs.com> wrote in message
news:1110186066.548970.227440@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
quote:

> AND SO IT GOES
>
> <Larry Parr lies. And so it goes.> -- Randy Bauer
>
> Here is the issue:
>
> Randy Bauer called on voters to support "the incumbents,"
> presumably NOT against this writer or others, but against rival
> candidates, whom he labelled "Sloanistas." If he did not mean the
> other candidates, then his smear was senseless.
>


Candidates and those who support their views are often lumped together. I
laid out a framework for determining whether or not somebody was a
Sloanista. Parr, rather than defend his support for the guy who drains USCF
resources by filing lawsuit upon lawsuit against the organization, goes on
the attack.

I didn't lump any other candidates because I have heard none express support
of Sloan. It wasn't meant to be a smear; my guess is it is only senseless
among the mendacious.

Randy Bauer


Copyright 2003 - 2009 gamesreviews.net Software forum  PC Hardware reviews