| Randy Bauer 2005-03-08, 5:53 pm |
|
<parrthenon@cs.com> wrote in message
news:1110274107.822310.286050@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
quote:
>
> MOLES
>
> <In other words, Larry Parr just wants another mole on the Board, there
> to feed him whatever inside information Larry wants and needs.> --
> Randy Bauer
>
> In a properly run organization there would be no need for moles
> because financial data would be available for all members to see as a
> matter of course.
>
> PHEW!
>
> Randy Bauer also writes, "I wouldn't call Larry Parr an
> independent commentator. In fact, I've labeled him a Sloanista, along
> with, of course, Sam Sloan. I have suggested rejecting the Sloanistas
> and sticking with the incumbants. That's the only commentary I've
> made."
>
> "The only commentary" that Mr. Bauer made? Phew!
>
> Mr. Bauer began with this smear, "If you want an honest,
> credible budget and a decent shot at maintaining budget surpluses,
> stick with the incumbents, not the Sloanistas."
>
> Mr. Bauer began by lying that he had not meant to include Greg
> Shahade among the "Sloanistas." He compounded the lie by calling Mr.
> Sloan a "Sloanista" and he continues with that imbecilic line. We all
> know that the "ista" suffix refers to supports, admirers, followers of
> a given person. Hence Fidelistas are not Fidel, but admirers. Hence
> Sandinistas are not Sandino, but admirers. His most recent account is
> that candidates (which ones?) are lumped together with those sharing
> their views.
Larry, for the last time, I DID NOT include any other candidate as a
Sloanista. If any want to voice their support for Sloan and his policies,
then they will be Sloanistas. So far, Larry Parr is the only one who fits
this description. Stop telling false tales and stop trying to drag others
down into the dirt. I have not written negative things about other
candidates other than Sloan, and asking voters to stick with the incumbants
is hardly negative campaigning.
quote:
>
> As for Mr. Bauer's attempt to suggest that he was speaking
> about yours truly when talking about keeping a credible budget and a
> surprlus, the claim is laughable. I am running for nothing, I am far
> away, and I am obviously NOT the alternative to his "incumbants [sic]."
> The alternatives are Shahade, Goichberg, Channing and Tanner. They
> are the ones threatening to produce a dishonest, incredible budget,
> etc.
For somebody who is running for nothing you spend a huge amount of time
writing about it. Of course I will talk about you and your incredible
decision to start your candidate slate with Sam Sloan. The word is
incredible. Larry Parr and Sam Sloan are not credible, and Parr's claims of
what is and is not a lie are the stuff that legends are made of.
quote:
>
Randy Bauer
|