| Chess One 2005-03-07, 9:52 pm |
| >>>
quote:
>
> I wouldn't call Larry Parr an independent commentator. In fact, I've
> labeled
> him a Sloanista, along with, of course, Sam Sloan. I have suggested
> rejecting
> the Sloanistas and sticking with the incumbants. That's the only
> commentary
> I've made.
>
> (snip)
>
> Because Larry Parr wrongly accused me of labeling other candidates,
You just said in the above that you labelled people Sloanistas. Its right
here in you own words.
in
quote:
> particular Greg Shahade, as Sloanistas. I have, on several occasions,
> pointed
> out my differences with Sam Sloan, and I believe his election would be a
> serious
> mistake for the organization.
>
> I've served on the Finance Committee and the Executive Board for two
> years, and
> in both years the USCF has lived within its budget. I would contrast that
> with
> the previous eight years, where the USCF ran deficits, sometimes in the
> hundreds
> of thousands of dollars. Connect the dots, Phil.
You cut my post! Which finsihed with:-
"Have you personally been able to address and share the issues as datum and
process, in conversations with others here who have the same information?
Or, overall all, have you decided that other people have no rights to
discuss them or even know about them? That is a journalist's question - if
you reply, let it be on the record."
And now you are on the record Randy, for avoiding it.
What nonsense word games! If you really have some experience in any of these
things, demonstrate it by posting the financial information that people
request.
Otherwise here you are on record for cutting what people request and
'standing on your record' which is just political talk - meaning absolutely
nothing.
I take formal note that you not only decline to reply to my question but you
cut it out of your response. That's not innocence. That's cheating.
Phil Innes
quote:
> Randy Bauer
>
|