|
Home > Archive > Chess politics > February 2005 > Become a CHESS GRANDMASTER WITH NLP!!
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
Become a CHESS GRANDMASTER WITH NLP!!
|
|
| Ray Gordon 2005-02-21, 9:47 pm |
| Silly me: I thought that studying the game 70-80 hours a week was the way to
improve. How wrong I was!!
Apparently, NLP is this incredible tool that lets us bypass the substance of
anything, and instead to use "pattern language" to achieve the same results
that used to be possible only with YEARS of hard work!!!
So forget all those silly training tools: just a few AFFIRMATIONS directed
at your "inner self" on a regular basis will have you crushing Kasparov in
NO TIME FLAT!
--
Ray Gordon, Author
http://www.cybersheet.com/easy.html
Seduction Made Easy. Get this book FREE when you buy participating
affiliated books!
http://www.cybersheet.com/library.html
The Seduction Library. Four free books to get you started on your quest to
get laid.
Don't buy anything from experts who won't debate on a free speech forum.
| |
| jamesrynd@aol.com 2005-02-22, 3:48 am |
| Although NLP has its plusses and minuses, it probably won't make you a
GM - or in fact, help you find all those "babes" you keep claiming to
seduce.
But given your consistently negative attitude, that may be one reason
why you are such a poor player (the other may be that 70-80 hours of
study is providing you with a negative return by exhausting your mind.
Oftentimes, less is more). Studies from the early 1900s to the present
show the one variable that enhances student performance on tests, with
all other variables equal, is a positive attitude.
It would certainly be interesting to see if a transfer exists, that is,
given equal talent, whether a positive attitude makes one a better
player.
| |
| Ray Gordon 2005-02-22, 3:48 am |
| > Although NLP has its plusses and minuses, it probably won't make you a
quote:
> GM - or in fact, help you find all those "babes" you keep claiming to
> seduce.
Are you a pussy-whipped geek?
quote:
> But given your consistently negative attitude,
You have time in this life to concern yourself with my attitude? My god.
Get a life.
quote:
>that may be one reason
> why you are such a poor player (the other may be that 70-80 hours of
> study is providing you with a negative return by exhausting your mind.
> Oftentimes, less is more).
So getting a 2000 USCF rating and beating masters within two years of
playing my first tournament game makes me a "poor player?"
quote:
>Studies from the early 1900s to the present
> show the one variable that enhances student performance on tests, with
> all other variables equal, is a positive attitude.
Like Fischer's? And there I thought it was my inability to transition to
the middlegame that was holding me back, tsk.
quote:
> It would certainly be interesting to see if a transfer exists, that is,
> given equal talent, whether a positive attitude makes one a better
> player.
I didn't realize that "positive attitude" was quantifiable to the point
where one could base a SCIENTIFIC study of it.
| |
| woogiex1 2005-02-22, 3:48 am |
| Ray Gordon wrote:
quote:
> Silly me: I thought that studying the game 70-80 hours a week was the way
> to
> improve. How wrong I was!!
>
> Apparently, NLP is this incredible tool that lets us bypass the substance
> of anything, and instead to use "pattern language" to achieve the same
> results that used to be possible only with YEARS of hard work!!!
>
> So forget all those silly training tools: just a few AFFIRMATIONS directed
> at your "inner self" on a regular basis will have you crushing Kasparov in
> NO TIME FLAT!
>
>
>
idiot
| |
| woogiex1 2005-02-23, 3:49 am |
| Ray Gordon wrote:
quote:
>
> Are you a pussy-whipped geek?
>
>
>
>
> You have time in this life to concern yourself with my attitude? My god.
> Get a life.
>
>
> So getting a 2000 USCF rating and beating masters within two years of
> playing my first tournament game makes me a "poor player?"
>
>
> Like Fischer's? And there I thought it was my inability to transition to
> the middlegame that was holding me back, tsk.
>
>
>
> I didn't realize that "positive attitude" was quantifiable to the point
> where one could base a SCIENTIFIC study of it.
are you a waster of the legal system's time?
|
| |
|
|