Home > Archive > Chess politics > January 2005 > Re: Braunlich's article, "Scholastics and the Soul of Chess" (OT)





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Re: Braunlich's article, "Scholastics and the Soul of Chess" (OT)
michael adams

2005-01-18, 9:46 am

Chess One wrote:

!}]..
quote:

> The difficulty in determining what is 'natural' for women is twofold:
> principally and the (a) first is [lol] we have not studied their chess play
> in any sincere way, [albeit there have been so few of them to study until
> recently], and (b) what comments exist have a naive methodology, which
> usually take as their measure the equally understudied 'way' that men play
> chess, with which it is immediately contrasted, and as if the male 'norm'
> was a term synonymous with 'nature'.



Possibly so Phil, though I have a hard time imagining Germ. Greer or
anyone else actually astride a 'triton' & giving it heaps round the
back-end of the White Isle in the dark, when the moon is ripe & after
midnight..

Copyright 2003 - 2009 gamesreviews.net Software forum  PC Hardware reviews