Home > Archive > Chess politics > January 2005 > Re: Braunlich's article, "Scholstics and the Soul of Chess" Noet to Tim H.





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Re: Braunlich's article, "Scholstics and the Soul of Chess" Noet to Tim H.
Kevin L. Bachler

2005-01-15, 5:46 pm

Sorry, just a typo in the subject line.

In article <csbjte01lcm@drn.newsguy.com>, Kevin L. Bachler says...
quote:

>
>In article <cs8b760ert@drn.newsguy.com>, Kevin L. Bachler says...
>
>BTW, my opinions above make me less popular with many scholastic people also.
>That's why I always thought it funny when people labeled me a scholastic guy,
>because clearly many of the scholastic people would not.
>
>Another example: In Illinois I think that scholastic (and high school) players
>should have to be ICA members to play in the state scholastic championship.
>That opinion is not liked by a lot of people. My general feeling though, is
>that this is an extra value provided by the state association. State
>association membership should be perfunctory. If there were cots requirements
>for any other child activity for something comparable, you wouldn't see Little
>League, or soccer, or anyone else say "we aren't going to charge it..."
>
>And, of course, to the extent that we get a dollar commitment to state
>associations, that helps grass roots efforts. And to the extent that these
>players get state magazines, and find out about adult tournaments, that could
>help to mainstream them.
>
>



--
Kevin L. Bachler
Copyright 2003 - 2009 gamesreviews.net Software forum  PC Hardware reviews