Home > Archive > Chess politics > September 2004 > Re: Tit for tat





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Re: Tit for tat
Jerzy

2004-09-30, 6:46 am

"NoMoreChess" wrote in message
news:20040930052719.03719.00001149@mb-m26.wmconnect.com...
quote:

> .
Bibuld,[vbcol=seagreen]
succeed[vbcol=seagreen]
write[vbcol=seagreen]
>
>
> It is highly unlikely that any such "scholars" would hold in very high

regard
quote:

> the practice of pathological lying, as Nick-the-liar has become accustomed

to.
quote:

>
> I won't even bother noting the utter sillyness of an anonymous poster

being
quote:

> so pretentious, while maintaining his anonymity.
>


The "honest Nick" loves to label people by "troll", "liar", "dishonest
person" etiquettes etc. everyone who objects his oftentimes one-sided
opinions.
On the other hand he pretends to be at least a professor of history and
mathematics at the university of Berkley :-)

IMHO, however, he is simply another anonymous coward and dishonest person
himself who wants to insult as many people as possible (a troll in his
terminology). I don`t think that answering to his numerous and lengthy
off-topic and non-chess posts does much sense here on chess newsgroups.

:-)

Regards,

Jerzy


Copyright 2003 - 2009 gamesreviews.net Software forum  PC Hardware reviews