|
| "Parrthenon" wrote in message
news:20040921074948.19078.00001254@mb-m29.news.cs.com...
quote:
> Having said all of the above, anyone is cockeyed when imagining
either
quote:
> that Iraq or the world is better off without Saddam Hussein. Iraq and the
> world ought to be better off without him, though it was not our job to
spend
quote:
> what will be hundreds of billions of dollars to effect said removal. So
botched
quote:
> has been our policy after conquering the country, we can say that by any
> rational reckoning of benefits and debits, Iraq and the world are
distinctly
quote:
> worse off after his overthrow. Certainly, the United States is worse off.
Our
quote:
> interests have been raped by this war.
I completely disagree with your statement above. Once you wrote about
bravery of Hitler and his generals. IMHO they were mad but neither brave nor
courageous. They were led by evil spirits at best. The same guidance we can
see in the present world where some evil spirits want to polarise humankind
between two poles : "fear" and "joy".
99 % of human population lived during middle ages in fear. Some evil spirits
want to bring back humankind into the same dark era. If we want to overcome
the heritage of middle ages we should be brave but not in the sense of
murderous
"bravery" of Hitler and his generals...
BTW it`s a big exaggeration to call Lasker a racist.
Regards,
Jerzy
|
|