Home > Archive > Chess politics > December 2004 > Re: minimization of the USCF





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Re: minimization of the USCF
Spam Scone

2004-12-29, 12:45 am


Parrthenon wrote:
quote:

> < Don't expect Johnsonpride to admit he's a trough-feeder. And Lord

knows he is
quote:

> a trough-feeder. > -- Neil Brennen
>
> But Eric did work hard at the Federation.


That doesn't mean he's not a trough-feeder. Remember the former Chess
Life staffer who was doing side work for chess politicos on USCF time?
She allegedly worked hard too.

My opinion is that the job was his
quote:

> life. A calling of a kind.
> All I am saying is how infinitely REFRESHING it would be if

Eric were to
quote:

> write: "I started out against the move to Crossville. Then I

realized that the
quote:

> Federation would be losing nearly its entire experienced staff. My

life was
quote:

> working in the interstices of organized chess, and the truth is that

I want
quote:

> that job back. Which is why I am now showing my loyalty to the

powers that
quote:

> be. Entre nous, I have also learned that many people considered me

rigid, and
quote:

> my most secret thought is that they are right. I promise that if the
> Federation permits me to return, I will work hard to remove that flaw

from my
quote:

> managerial thinking and conduct. I will cease seeking to find

reasons to
quote:

> justify my decisions. If my original reasons are clearly wrong, I

will
quote:

> immediately reconsider a given issue."
>
> For at least some of us who knew Eric in the early-to-mid

1990s, the
quote:

> above seems as obvious as the sun at high noon on a clear, dulcet

summer's day.

So you are saying that if Eric removes the "flaws" in his nature
(dishonesty, desire for control over others, sucking up to whatever and
whoever has power, etc, )that should cause all right-thinking
individuals to keep him out of New Windsor, he should be allowed back
in? Agreed. But it's hardly an original thought.

Copyright 2003 - 2008 gamesreviews.net Software forum  PC Hardware reviews