Home > Archive > Chess politics > December 2004 > Re: The Case of the strange C-pawn and Black's third move





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Re: The Case of the strange C-pawn and Black's third move
Chess One

2004-12-27, 12:45 am

Dear Neil, see //whole// post for full details...

Wanna continue to play for money? I will play two moves as black without
reference to any White moves against you.

The real questions here for deep chess thinkers is what possible 'blind
move' can black play as move //three// which does not result in the loss of
a piece or mate, or catastrophic loss? ; )))

Black has played 1...c5, then 2. e6.... and 3... ? Against any play.

Cordially, Phil

"Spam Scone" <Spamscone@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1104073359.672002.145190@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
quote:

>
> Chess One wrote:
> right.
> this
>
> Then you aren't giving "pawn and two." Unless your 1....c5 was a typo
> for 2...c5.
>



Copyright 2003 - 2008 gamesreviews.net Software forum  PC Hardware reviews