| Jerome Bibuld 2004-12-24, 12:45 am |
| Heil Dubya!
Of course, the world at large is more likely to believe U. S. Navy mercenary
NONC0M XXXXXXX Nemmers -- safe in Illinois all these months and years of the U.
S. INVASIONS of Afghanistan and Iraq -- than a commissioned officer PILOT who
did time in Iraq. So what else does U. S. Navy mercenary NONCOM XXXXXXX
Nemmers claim?
Meanwhile, I have had another exchange with my grandson, who has given me
permission to quote his most recent email message, which follows.
Happy Holidays Grandpa,
In reference to your question, the video you lent me was not a factor in
my determination that the U.S. Government was responsible for 911. I knew it
would help me solidify some of my own arguments in favor of my new reality.
As a lifelong pilot, even before I was licensed, and airline hopeful, I
was strongly moved by the events engulfing Pan AM flight 103, TWA 800, and
especially 911.
My rage after 911 against "radical Islam" had peaked and I had taken it
personally. I watched as the news media showed me pictures of "islamists"
daring us to respond as if we weren't human and didn't have the right to
respond to the deaths of thousands of our countrymen. For many painful months,
I eagerly awaited a massive offensive into Afghanistan which would require my
transfer to infantry, and which would lead to death of Osama Bin laden after
about a month or more of torture. I even experienced pagan desires of eating
one of his vital organs, smashing his brain beneath my boot, and hunting down
his spawn so that I would know in my heart that he is dead! I eagerly looked
forward to treating Al Queda, the Taliban, and anyone who resisted as cruelly
as the treatment those crewmembers and passengers, MY crewmembers and MY
passengers received as they watched the planet earth come up to meet them with
their stomachs in their throats.
A lot of time and experience in this so called war has changed my reality
and outlook.
My rage gradually shifted towards the military and the media, while remaining
with so called radical islamists. I became angry at the excuses I heard from
others around me about why we weren't going after Osama. GO SHOPPING? GO ON
VACATION? WHAT THE F)(*^)^*&*()CK!?!?!?!?!?! Excuses included, "we have to
use special forces and intelligence" for this new type of warfare" and my
personal favorite "Osama's probably already dead" [by a cave in from our
bombing]. The latter is impossible since our military gave him a month's head
start before even the first bomb was dropped! I was strongly opposed to the
excessive use of airpower and special forces as air power leads to civilian
casualties and lets the enemy know you're coming and what objectives are
important to you while strengthening the will of the enemy to resist. Special
forces; well anybody ever heard of Somalia? Special forces are good at looking
cool, but when you're outnumbered it doesn't matter how "special" or "elite"
you are, you're hamburger. All special is good for is riding the small bus to
school! How could they use only special forces anyway? Their missions include
recon, demo, sniping, and rescue, not Invasion!
As far as the media was concerned; there was no coverage of the hunt for Osama!
None!
Anthrax? Who cares only killed 5 vs 3000! Dirty nukes that don't really go
nuclear? So. Poison pen darts. James bond is in on this too? Missing little
white girls. Pervs have been snatching and killing kids since we crawled out
of the jungle! That's why you never let the brats out of your sight until they
can run and use a phone!!! What about the boys? What about the black and
hispanic kids? Pardon me, but F&$*$CK the F*&)((^CKING media!
There were just too many questions, and as a pilot, the answers weren't Kosher.
1. A few terrorists with boxcutterd held off 75 or more DESPERATE people with
luggage, laptops, shoes, fire extinguishers, cellphones, pda's, pens, seatbelt
buckes, toilet seats, and a multitude of other things that could be used as
weapons while making their way through the airplane and an invariably locked
metal door.
2. An airplane, made as light as possible, with the lightest materials that
can safely be employed, caused catastrophic structural damage to a building
made if a multitude of I beams of almost indestructable construction grade
steel, each as wide as a bus, each encased in and reinforced by concrete over a
yard in thickness. Those buildings are so heavy and so strong, that they could
only have been built exactly where they are in lower manhattan so that they are
supported by the planet Earth itself and held aloft by its granite.
3. Burning fuel "weakened" the buildings and the floors pancaked down. The
fuel was burning black, thus not burning as hot as it could. I learned this
while studying steam ship engineering. If all you needed to weaken steel was
jet fuel, then why do people use blowtorches and arch welders, hey all you need
is jet fuel right?
4. The FAA didn't know that an airplane that had filed an IFR flight plan was
off course and off altitude careening towards New York and didn't have time to
call in Air Support.
5. All footage of the Pentagon was hidden behind that Hill, that huge hill, but
somehow a jetliner could come in shallow enough at 500 MPH to hit that short
building which stood not much higher than the jet sits when its on the ground
on the exact face that sits behind that hill. It takes something called VASI
(visual approach slope indicator) to allow that jet to touch down within 2000
feet of the beginning of a 2 mile long runway at 150 miles per hour. A shallow
angle to the face of a short building behind a large hill at 500 miles per hour
hitting the building at a level attitude is almost impossible. It's not
something an empasssioned terrorist could do on his first try.
Angel's calling. anyway, as a pilot, with some good engineering knowledge. NO
WAY!
P.S. and definitely not last or least why was there no serious pursuit of
Osama, the worst (non political) serial mass murderer of all time?
quote:
> From: "Matt Nemmers" <qcch...@mcnospamhsi.com>
> Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2004 07:20:09 GMT
> Local: Wed, Dec 22 2004 11:20 pm
> Subject: Re: Petition to the U. S. Senate Concerning "
quote:
> "Jerome Bibuld" <chessph...@aol.comnospam> wrote in message
> news:20041222222449.00289.00002097@mb-m17.aol.com...
[vbcol=seagreen]
Nobody notices chrome-plated butter-bars, let alone one who subscribes to
the rubbish you post here.
MN
(VERY MUCH snipped from two posts.)
I recently have discovered a video, 911 in Plane Site, that offers proofs of
what I have been saying since 11 September 2001: the attacks on the Twin Towers
and the Pentagon were organized and executed by the rulers of the U. S. A. I
was not aware of what appears to be the fact that neither of the missiles
("airplanes") that struck the Twin Towers was a commercial airliner or that NO
significant wreckage appears in any of the films of the "attack" on the
Pentagon. If that is the case, an interesting question is, what happened to
the three commercial airliners.
One could ask, then, if the explosion that destroyed the Trans-World airliner
over the Atlantic Ocean in 1996 was a test of CIA (military) preparation for
"the big one". Did the U. S. rulers sink the commercial airliners in the
Atlantic and use other missiles (in the forms of airplanes) to attack the Twin
Towers? As for the "attack" on the Pentagon, the evidence of the video leads
me to believe that the damage was created by explosions set inside the
building, itself.
Heute Uhmuhrikkka, Afghanistan, Irak und Häiti. Morgen di ganze Welt!
Uhmuhrikkka, Uhmuhrikkka über Alles!
(The more information that comes out about the attacks on the Twin Towers and
the Pentagon of 11 September 2001 the more it appears that those attacks were
organized by the rulers of the United States and were intended to have the same
effect on the people of the United States that the Reichstag fire had on the
people of Germany in 1933.)
Fight terrorism! Dissolve the CIA and disarm the Pentagon! (I have watched
the hearings of the Commission to investigate the attacks on the Twin Towers
and the Pentagon of 11 September 2001. As a result, I have become convinced
that every one of the witnesses and their four Presidents - and every one of
the Commissioners - should be tried for:
(1. Conspiracy to commit terrorism; and/or
(2. Commission of terrorist acts; and/or
(3. Conspiracy to commit murder; and/or
(4. Commission of murder; and/or
(5. Treason; and/or
(6. Suborning one or more of the above acts.)
Fraternally,
Jerome Bibuld
gens una sumus
|