| Jürgen R. 2004-11-30, 9:45 am |
| "Chess One" <innes8@verizon.net> wrote:
quote:
>
>"Parrthenon" <parrthenon@cs.com> wrote in message
>news:20041128091122.08281.00001566@mb-m04.news.cs.com...
>
>
>Yes. Somehow the official 'discussion' has come to be about Sam's armpits,
>or his 'credability'.*
>
>One hopes that Judge Judy will insist on an actual conversation, and the law
>will be blind to who proposes information, as the Constitution intended.
>
>Rather than of official euphemisms in place of plain speaking, such as;
>
>claims for questions,
>liar for don't like,
>credability for popularity,
>no-hidden agenda for undisclosed contracts,
>and if the word 'compare' should emerge,
>comparison won't be made with a crab-shack in Maine.
>
>Phil Innes
>
>Not incidentally, *credability, is from a stem~ [L.] Credo,
No, it isn't. The word 'credability' does not exist in English.
quote:
> to believe, and
>might be contrasted not with dis-believe, but with an examination of facts,
>not beliefs, opinion and 'spin'.
>
>
>
|