| Tom Klem 2004-11-30, 12:45 am |
| Acknowledged.
Stay well,
Tom Klem
"Chess One" <innes8@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:N_Eqd.1831$_C2.1830@trndny01...
quote:
>
> "Tom Klem" <thewiz@lspamodem.com> wrote in message
> news:x0zqd.179968$G15.179370@fed1read03...
>
> Tom, did you ever meet a bloke called Doug Wilkinson. He came to Nevada
and
quote:
> won the Open there when it was a very big tournament, rated about 2400. He
> now lives around here and is a sometimes sparring partner.
>
bankruptcy[vbcol=seagreen]
at[vbcol=seagreen]
"So[vbcol=seagreen]
a[vbcol=seagreen]
memberships[vbcol=seagreen]
were[vbcol=seagreen]
>
> I'll tell you that my personal ambition in all this is to engage a set of
> ideas, and not a set of personalities. Do you remember those scenes from
> "Searching for Bobby Fischer" when young Josh has a crisis about his play,
> and essentially has to decide whether to play against [=hate!] the other
> player, or to play the board?
>
> I think both ways are possible to play chess, but I also think each way
> yields different results - one difference is the quality of the result,
both
quote:
> of the game itself, and also how one feels about playing it.
>
> Its common for us foreigners to remark on the extreme level of personal
> reflections, positive or negative, in US chess life, and given all that
you
quote:
> have said above - when will it be time to try 'playing the board' so to
> speak?
>
> As for lying, I am a liar. That doesn't disqualify me from 'playing the
> board'. It also allows me to relate to lying in others, and try to examine
> objectively what's true.
>
> I don't know what's true or not in this particular situation. Although I
> have read some things here which are plainly flase. What doesn't seem
decent
quote:
> to me is to justify an action by demeaning a critic of it.
>
> More later Tom.
>
> Phil
>
Sam's[vbcol=seagreen]
just[vbcol=seagreen]
about[vbcol=seagreen]
alas,[vbcol=seagreen]
seem[vbcol=seagreen]
(at[vbcol=seagreen]
for[vbcol=seagreen]
his.[vbcol=seagreen]
like[vbcol=seagreen]
fact,[vbcol=seagreen]
Corssville[vbcol=seagreen]
slant[vbcol=seagreen]
is[vbcol=seagreen]
by[vbcol=seagreen]
(and[vbcol=seagreen]
need[vbcol=seagreen]
fiduciary[vbcol=seagreen]
litigation.[vbcol=seagreen]
better[vbcol=seagreen]
along[vbcol=seagreen]
can[vbcol=seagreen]
definition[vbcol=seagreen]
to[vbcol=seagreen]
or,[vbcol=seagreen]
some[vbcol=seagreen]
a[vbcol=seagreen]
a[vbcol=seagreen]
will[vbcol=seagreen]
>
>
|