| Chess One 2004-11-30, 12:45 am |
|
"Mike Nolan" <nolan@gw.tssi.com> wrote in message
news:cogioe$d5d$1@gw.tssi.com...
quote:
> "Chess One" <innes8@verizon.net> writes:
>
>
> It does????
>
> I think Hanke is somewhat qualified and will not apply.
>
> You and Larry apparently think he is eminently qualified and should not
> apply.
>
> What's left to discuss other than to attempt to sully Tim's reputation
> further?
Since Tim Hanke is currently resolutely and publicly not allied with either
Larry Parr, nor myself, and since we both suggest, despite this //strong//
difference, that he would be suitable as CL editor, why do you ask us this
question?
It is you Mike, who doubt the man's ability. But you think there is no basis
in experience to determine it objectively?
The back of my hand to your dismissal of him.
You make no offer to discuss his qualification and you don't see any reason
from your own perspective to engage with those who actually know something.
Phil Innes
quote:
> Mike Nolan
|