| Author |
Sloan drops his lawsuit?
|
|
| Aftermath Fan 2004-11-28, 12:45 am |
| I've read that Sam Sloan hasn't served the defendents in Sloan v.
Marinello, as required. There's a rumor going around that he's
dropping his lawsuit owing to the logistical burdens.
Sam?
| |
| Tom Klem 2004-11-28, 12:45 am |
| Are you sure it wasn't something else he was dropping?
--
Tom Klem
"SBC - Unfair and unbalanced news reporters"
---Slogan of Sloan Broad Corporation
"Aftermath Fan" <survivalist@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:94ca4b7d.0411271609.4b152c8a@posting.google.com...
quote:
> I've read that Sam Sloan hasn't served the defendents in Sloan v.
> Marinello, as required. There's a rumor going around that he's
> dropping his lawsuit owing to the logistical burdens.
>
> Sam?
| |
|
|
"Aftermath Fan" <survivalist@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:94ca4b7d.0411271609.4b152c8a@posting.google.com...
quote:
> I've read that Sam Sloan hasn't served the defendents in Sloan v.
> Marinello, as required. There's a rumor going around that he's
> dropping his lawsuit owing to the logistical burdens.
>
> Sam?
It is an old USCF tradition not to pursue pro se lawsuits.
|
|
|
|