quote:

---

> God help me, I actually read something posted on Sam's site, in
> particular the decision handed down by the court.
>
> Essentially, the judge tossed Sam's suit for failure to follow proper
> procedure. Imagine that. While it is without prejudice, meaning he
> can come back, he also included this paragraph:
>
> "Based on the complex nature of the issues involved, this Court
> requires, pursuant to CPLR §1101(b), that this movant submit a
> certificate of an attorney stating that the attorney has examined the
> action and believes there is merit to the moving party's contentions.
> The attorney should address issues such as standing and the
> appropriateness of the remedies requested (including the issuance of
> an injunction against an official of another state)."
>
> These are sufficiently complex issues that no lawyer worth his salt
> would file such an affidavit without some significant research.
> Hopefully, none of my brothers in the NY bar will assist the looney,
> and this will be a dead issue.
>
> There is justice.
>
> ==Dondo

quote:

---

>
>"Don C. Aldrich" <dondo@mn.rr.com> wrote in message
>news:4lcgp0lpjaq5gdn3f627n6jrobo3ckps78@4ax.com...
>
>I know Attorney Don Aldrich. Attorney Don Aldrich is a friend of mine. Sam
>Sloan is no Don Aldrich.
>
>Randy Bauer

quote:

---

>Hopefully, none of my brothers in the NY bar will assist the looney,

quote:

---

>You can find the case by doing a search at
>http://portal.courts.state.ny.us/pl..._SCHEDULES.show
>
>Sam Sloan

quote:

---

>You are both wrong. The suit is not tossed. I paid the filing fee of
>$305 on Friday, November 12. In a strange ruling, the clerk of court
>decided that I had to re-file it under a new index number. So the case
>now has a new index number of 2004-7739.
>
>The new suit is definately still pending because by the time I paid
>the filing fee, the judge was gone for the day, so the first time he
>could rule upon it would be Monday, which is later today.
>
>You can find the case by doing a search at
>http://portal.courts.state.ny.us/pl..._SCHEDULES.show
>
>Sam Sloan

quote:

---

>Well, if you didn't include an affidavit from an attorney as
>instructed by the judge, you can kiss that filing fee goodbye.
>
>==Dondo

quote:

---

> That is not what the judge wrote at all. He wrote that I must either
> pay the $305 filing fee or provide an affidavit from an attorney, but
> not both.

quote:

---

> Dumbkoff.

quote:

---

>
>"Sam Sloan" <sloan@ishipress.com> wrote in message
>news:41995091.26260875@ca.news.verio.net...
>
>
>Since you have neither I guess it's all so much shit for the birds.
>
>
>Poor Sam, he makes reference to himself.

quote:

---

> God help me, I actually read something posted on Sam's site, in
> particular the decision handed down by the court.
>
> Essentially, the judge tossed Sam's suit for failure to follow proper
> procedure. Imagine that. While it is without prejudice, meaning he
> can come back, he also included this paragraph:
>
> "Based on the complex nature of the issues involved, this Court
> requires, pursuant to CPLR §1101(b), that this movant submit a
> certificate of an attorney stating that the attorney has examined the
> action and believes there is merit to the moving party's contentions.
> The attorney should address issues such as standing and the
> appropriateness of the remedies requested (including the issuance of
> an injunction against an official of another state)."
>
> These are sufficiently complex issues that no lawyer worth his salt
> would file such an affidavit without some significant research.
> Hopefully, none of my brothers in the NY bar will assist the looney,
> and this will be a dead issue.
>
> There is justice.
>
> ==Dondo

quote:

---

>
>Sam,
>
>My bridge partner, who lives a few blocks away from you, is also an amaateur
>litigator. It's a waste of time. Even when you're right, they find a way to
>screw you.

quote:

---

>On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 02:04:51 -0500, "Angelo DePalma"
><adpspammersgotohell@tellurian.net> wrote:
>
>
>This is certainly true and I always say that no matter how air-tight a
>court case might seem to be, the judge will often make some wacko or
>crazy ruling and there is nothing you can do about it.
>
>I know this better than anyone because I had my mother and my daughter
>both KIDNAPPED by completely crooked Virginia judges and there has
>been nothing I could do about it.
>
>That is why I ran for Congress so that if I get elected I can have
>those peoiple arrested and put in prison where they belong.

quote:

---

>
>However, this works two ways. I would not want to be one of the four
>board members of the USCF who voted in favor of the move where they
>could go to prison for this, not to mention the possibility that one
>of the 25 people who is losing their job because of their acts might
>be more than a little upset over this.
>
>Sam Sloan

quote:

---

>
>You mean if you were a member of Congress you could just ask the cops
>to lock up the people you don't like? Is that part of the Homeland
>Security Law?

quote:

---

> On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 12:12:50 GMT, jurgenr@web.de (Jürgen R.) wrote:
>
>
> Yes, and I am glad that you understood that legal point.
>
> The Homeland Security Law does indeed give those in charge the right
> to lock up indefinitely anybody they do not like, regardless of
> whether any violation of law is involved.
>
> Sam Sloan

quote:

---

>
>"Don C. Aldrich" <dondo@mn.rr.com> wrote in message
>news:4lcgp0lpjaq5gdn3f627n6jrobo3ckps78@4ax.com...
>
>I know Attorney Don Aldrich. Attorney Don Aldrich is a friend of mine. Sam
>Sloan is no Don Aldrich.
>
>Randy Bauer

quote:

---

> Remember that he claimed that I would lose my case against the Taxi
> and Limousine Commission, but I won that case.

quote:

---

> On Mon, 15 Nov 2004 04:53:26 GMT, "Randy Bauer"
> <randybauer2300@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
> Dumbo, who claims to be a lawyer, and a good one at that, is wrong
> again.
>
> Remember that he claimed that I would lose my case against the Taxi
> and Limousine Commission, but I won that case.
>
> Here again, he claimed that my case had been thrown out of court, but
> as everybody can see now, my case is going strong with a hearing
> scheduled for November 30.
>
> Is Dumbo/Dondo really a lawyer and is he really a good one?
>
> It was not rocket science to see that I had a legally sound case.
>
> Sam Sloan

quote:

---

>
>"Don C. Aldrich" <dondo@mn.rr.com> wrote in message
>news:4lcgp0lpjaq5gdn3f627n6jrobo3ckps78@4ax.com...
>
>I know Attorney Don Aldrich. Attorney Don Aldrich is a friend of mine. Sam
>Sloan is no Don Aldrich.
>
>Randy Bauer

quote:

---

> "Sam Sloan" <sloan@ishipress.com> wrote in message
> news:419c9bbd.33352859@ca.news.verio.net...
>
>
> Curious that you never drove a cab again after your "win".

quote:

---

> On Mon, 15 Nov 2004 04:53:26 GMT, "Randy Bauer"
> <randybauer2300@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
> Dumbo, who claims to be a lawyer, and a good one at that, is wrong
> again.
>
> Remember that he claimed that I would lose my case against the Taxi
> and Limousine Commission, but I won that case.

quote:

---

> God help me, I actually read something posted on Sam's site, in
> particular the decision handed down by the court.
>
> Essentially, the judge tossed Sam's suit for failure to follow proper
> procedure. Imagine that. While it is without prejudice, meaning he
> can come back, he also included this paragraph:
>
> "Based on the complex nature of the issues involved, this Court
> requires, pursuant to CPLR §1101(b), that this movant submit a
> certificate of an attorney stating that the attorney has examined the
> action and believes there is merit to the moving party's contentions.
> The attorney should address issues such as standing and the
> appropriateness of the remedies requested (including the issuance of
> an injunction against an official of another state)."
>
> These are sufficiently complex issues that no lawyer worth his salt
> would file such an affidavit without some significant research.
> Hopefully, none of my brothers in the NY bar will assist the looney,
> and this will be a dead issue.
>
> There is justice.
>
> ==Dondo

quote:

---

>On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 02:04:51 -0500, "Angelo DePalma"
><adpspammersgotohell@tellurian.net> wrote:
>
>
>This is certainly true and I always say that no matter how air-tight a
>court case might seem to be, the judge will often make some wacko or
>crazy ruling and there is nothing you can do about it.
>
>I know this better than anyone because I had my mother and my daughter
>both KIDNAPPED by completely crooked Virginia judges and there has
>been nothing I could do about it.
>
>That is why I ran for Congress so that if I get elected I can have
>those peoiple arrested and put in prison where they belong.

quote:

---

>
>However, this works two ways. I would not want to be one of the four
>board members of the USCF who voted in favor of the move where they
>could go to prison for this, not to mention the possibility that one
>of the 25 people who is losing their job because of their acts might
>be more than a little upset over this.
>
>Sam Sloan

quote:

---

>
>"Sam Sloan" <sloan@ishipress.com> wrote in message
>news:41995091.26260875@ca.news.verio.net...
>
>
>Since you have neither I guess it's all so much shit for the birds.
>
>
>Poor Sam, he makes reference to himself.

quote:

---

> On Mon, 15 Nov 2004 20:31:38 -0500, "StanB" <stanbooz@comXXXcast.net>
> wrote:
>
>
> Stan is wrong, as usual. I paid the $305 filing fee on Friday.
>
> Sam Sloan

quote:

---

>sloan@ishipress.com (Sam Sloan) wrote in message news:<4199597b.28543078@ca.news.verio.net>...
>
>Care to tell us who your puppetmaster is? Who is funding this suit?

quote:

---

> Nobody is my puppetmaster. I did all the legal research and wrote the
> whole thing myself.

quote:

---

> On Mon, 15 Nov 2004 04:53:26 GMT, "Randy Bauer"
> <randybauer2300@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
> Dumbo, who claims to be a lawyer, and a good one at that, is wrong
> again.
>
> Remember that he claimed that I would lose my case against the Taxi
> and Limousine Commission, but I won that case.
>
> Here again, he claimed that my case had been thrown out of court, but
> as everybody can see now, my case is going strong with a hearing
> scheduled for November 30.
>
> Is Dumbo/Dondo really a lawyer and is he really a good one?
>
> It was not rocket science to see that I had a legally sound case.
>
> Sam Sloan

quote:

---

>You can find the case by doing a search at
>http://portal.courts.state.ny.us/pl..._SCHEDULES.show
>
>Sam Sloan

quote:

---

>You are both wrong. The suit is not tossed. I paid the filing fee of
>$305 on Friday, November 12. In a strange ruling, the clerk of court
>decided that I had to re-file it under a new index number. So the case
>now has a new index number of 2004-7739.
>
>The new suit is definately still pending because by the time I paid
>the filing fee, the judge was gone for the day, so the first time he
>could rule upon it would be Monday, which is later today.
>
>You can find the case by doing a search at
>http://portal.courts.state.ny.us/pl..._SCHEDULES.show
>
>Sam Sloan

quote:

---

>Well, if you didn't include an affidavit from an attorney as
>instructed by the judge, you can kiss that filing fee goodbye.
>
>==Dondo

quote:

---

> "Sam Sloan" <sloan@ishipress.com> wrote in message
> news:419c9bbd.33352859@ca.news.verio.net...
>
>
> Curious that you never drove a cab again after your "win".

quote:

---

>I'm going to hate myself in the morning for this, I just know it.
>Posting yet again to a Sloan thread.
>
>Sam, you are such an idiot. It is criminal that the likes of you is
>about to cost our federation money due to your insane view of the
>world.
>
>An 'order to show cause' is not a victory. It is nothing more than a
>notice of motion. That you had to do it twice does not bode well for
>your success.
>
>I am confident you will not survive the hearing with your case in
>tact. The only question is whether you will be appropriately
>sanctioned for your actions in bad faith.
>
>==Dondo

quote:

---

>
>You mean if you were a member of Congress you could just ask the cops
>to lock up the people you don't like? Is that part of the Homeland
>Security Law?

quote:

---

> That is not what the judge wrote at all. He wrote that I must either
> pay the $305 filing fee or provide an affidavit from an attorney, but
> not both.

quote:

---

> Dumbkoff.

quote:

---

>
>"Sam Sloan" <sloan@ishipress.com> wrote in message
>news:41995091.26260875@ca.news.verio.net...
>
>
>Since you have neither I guess it's all so much shit for the birds.
>
>
>Poor Sam, he makes reference to himself.

quote:

---

> God help me, I actually read something posted on Sam's site, in
> particular the decision handed down by the court.
>
> Essentially, the judge tossed Sam's suit for failure to follow proper
> procedure. Imagine that. While it is without prejudice, meaning he
> can come back, he also included this paragraph:
>
> "Based on the complex nature of the issues involved, this Court
> requires, pursuant to CPLR §1101(b), that this movant submit a
> certificate of an attorney stating that the attorney has examined the
> action and believes there is merit to the moving party's contentions.
> The attorney should address issues such as standing and the
> appropriateness of the remedies requested (including the issuance of
> an injunction against an official of another state)."
>
> These are sufficiently complex issues that no lawyer worth his salt
> would file such an affidavit without some significant research.
> Hopefully, none of my brothers in the NY bar will assist the looney,
> and this will be a dead issue.
>
> There is justice.
>
> ==Dondo

quote:

---

>
>Sam,
>
>My bridge partner, who lives a few blocks away from you, is also an amaateur
>litigator. It's a waste of time. Even when you're right, they find a way to
>screw you.

quote:

---

>On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 02:04:51 -0500, "Angelo DePalma"
><adpspammersgotohell@tellurian.net> wrote:
>
>
>This is certainly true and I always say that no matter how air-tight a
>court case might seem to be, the judge will often make some wacko or
>crazy ruling and there is nothing you can do about it.
>
>I know this better than anyone because I had my mother and my daughter
>both KIDNAPPED by completely crooked Virginia judges and there has
>been nothing I could do about it.
>
>That is why I ran for Congress so that if I get elected I can have
>those peoiple arrested and put in prison where they belong.

quote:

---

>
>However, this works two ways. I would not want to be one of the four
>board members of the USCF who voted in favor of the move where they
>could go to prison for this, not to mention the possibility that one
>of the 25 people who is losing their job because of their acts might
>be more than a little upset over this.
>
>Sam Sloan

quote:

---

> On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 12:12:50 GMT, jurgenr@web.de (Jürgen R.) wrote:
>
>
> Yes, and I am glad that you understood that legal point.
>
> The Homeland Security Law does indeed give those in charge the right
> to lock up indefinitely anybody they do not like, regardless of
> whether any violation of law is involved.
>
> Sam Sloan

quote:

---

> Remember that he claimed that I would lose my case against the Taxi
> and Limousine Commission, but I won that case.

quote:

---

> God help me, I actually read something posted on Sam's site, in
> particular the decision handed down by the court.
>
> Essentially, the judge tossed Sam's suit for failure to follow proper
> procedure. Imagine that. While it is without prejudice, meaning he
> can come back, he also included this paragraph:
>
> "Based on the complex nature of the issues involved, this Court
> requires, pursuant to CPLR §1101(b), that this movant submit a
> certificate of an attorney stating that the attorney has examined the
> action and believes there is merit to the moving party's contentions.
> The attorney should address issues such as standing and the
> appropriateness of the remedies requested (including the issuance of
> an injunction against an official of another state)."
>
> These are sufficiently complex issues that no lawyer worth his salt
> would file such an affidavit without some significant research.
> Hopefully, none of my brothers in the NY bar will assist the looney,
> and this will be a dead issue.
>
> There is justice.
>
> ==Dondo

quote:

---

> On Mon, 15 Nov 2004 04:53:26 GMT, "Randy Bauer"
> <randybauer2300@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
> Dumbo, who claims to be a lawyer, and a good one at that, is wrong
> again.
>
> Remember that he claimed that I would lose my case against the Taxi
> and Limousine Commission, but I won that case.
>
> Here again, he claimed that my case had been thrown out of court, but
> as everybody can see now, my case is going strong with a hearing
> scheduled for November 30.
>
> Is Dumbo/Dondo really a lawyer and is he really a good one?
>
> It was not rocket science to see that I had a legally sound case.
>
> Sam Sloan

quote:

---

> "Someone once said: "pawn sacs are for wimps...real men sac pieces".
> Interesting, considering how you sac'd a pawn in our game (from's gambit),
> and I went on to sacrifice a knight for an attack against the black king.
>
> Now Aldrich, who was it who said that bit about sacrifices again?
>
> Jason Repa"
>
> Repa..you remind me of Mother Teresa..
>
>
>
>
>
>

quote:

---

> <<<Jason Repa>>>
>
> Must be a Full Moon....

quote:

---

> <<<Jason Repa>>>
>
> Must be a Full Moon....

quote:

---

>I'm going to hate myself in the morning for this, I just know it.
>Posting yet again to a Sloan thread.
>
>Sam, you are such an idiot. It is criminal that the likes of you is
>about to cost our federation money due to your insane view of the
>world.
>
>An 'order to show cause' is not a victory. It is nothing more than a
>notice of motion. That you had to do it twice does not bode well for
>your success.
>
>I am confident you will not survive the hearing with your case in
>tact. The only question is whether you will be appropriately
>sanctioned for your actions in bad faith.
>
>==Dondo