|
| Chess One wrote:
quote:
> "Nick" <nickbourbaki3@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:1140297728.961419.54460@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>
> Harold Buck is a sensible man, as far as I can
> determine by virtue of his postings here,
Harold Buck's level of literacy seems to approach
Phil Innes's level of literacy. And it's usually worth about
as little to attempt to communicate with either of them.
quote:
> and given your now clear context
What I wrote originally should have been clear enough
to anyone who's even moderately literate in English.
quote:
> will, I am sure, be able to appreciate your context.
Harold Buck chose to snip my context.
quote:
> Is the issue solved by providing the deaf (or even dumb,
> or other disadvantage [unsighted?]) participant a card
> which delares (a) draw offer and (b) request for arbiter
> assistance?
I am not certain that 'the issue (would be) solved'
completely, but that suggestion (above) should help.
--Nick
|
|