| Louis Blair 2006-02-26, 7:37 pm |
| Larry Parr wrote (17 Feb 2006 17:40:36 -0800):
quote:
> The other side [of the equation], which begins
> to appear more and more heavy on the ethical
> teeter-totter, is why a possibly very high paying
> position -- perhaps second to the Executive
> Director -- was not advertised.
_
Why does this question "[begin] to appear more
and more heavy on the ethical teeter-totter"? Has
any additional information been uncovered? Does
Larry Parr have any evidence at all that the
unadvertised position was "very high paying"
and/or "second to the Executive Director"?
_
"No one believes the $75k number!
Only some fool can't write his own
name and pretends to be, others
asserts it." - Phil Innes (Fri,
17 Feb 2006 15:00:45 GMT)
|