Home > Archive > Flight simulator > March 2006 > Wind Direction?





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Wind Direction?
Ibby \(The Artist Formerly Known as Chris\)

2006-03-15, 7:34 pm

Please excuse this extremely silly question but can someone clarify if the
wind direction quoted by ATIS comes from or goes toward the quoted bearing
i.e. Wind 090 at 10 knots, does this mean the wind is coming from 090 and
blowing towards 270 or the other way round?

Thanks

--
Ibby (The artist formerly known as Chris)



William

2006-03-15, 7:34 pm

coming from 090 so runway 9 or closest match

Bill


"Ibby (The Artist Formerly Known as Chris)" <donotemailme@nothere.com> wrote
in message news:dv9al6$mqi$1@nwrdmz02.dmz.ncs.ea.ibs-infra.bt.com...
quote:

> Please excuse this extremely silly question but can someone clarify if the
> wind direction quoted by ATIS comes from or goes toward the quoted bearing
> i.e. Wind 090 at 10 knots, does this mean the wind is coming from 090 and
> blowing towards 270 or the other way round?
>
> Thanks
>
> --
> Ibby (The artist formerly known as Chris)
>
>
>



Beech45Whiskey

2006-03-15, 7:34 pm

"Ibby (The Artist Formerly Known as Chris)" <donotemailme@nothere.com>
wrote:
quote:

> Please excuse this extremely silly question but can someone clarify if the
> wind direction quoted by ATIS comes from or goes toward the quoted bearing
> i.e. Wind 090 at 10 knots, does this mean the wind is coming from 090 and
> blowing towards 270 or the other way round?


Don't feel silly. I recall having the same confusion when I first started
my flight training.

As William pointed out, the ATIS is stating winds from their source, as in
the winds are coming FROM 090 at 10 kts. This will help you to quickly
visualize the winds in relation to the landing runway, since the objective
is to land into the wind. (Runway number with a trailing ZERO is within
ten degrees of its magnetic heading - as in runway 27 is *roughly* on a
magnetic heading of 270.)

Also worth pointing out is that ATIS-reported winds are *magnetic*
direction (relative to magnetic north) whereas winds reported in a wind's
aloft forecast are reported in true heading (relative to true north). This
is done because flight planning begins with all headings first being
related to true north, then converted to magnetic.

--
Peter
Ibby \(The Artist Formerly Known as Chris\)

2006-03-15, 7:35 pm

Thanks for that. I have to say I don't get into the nitty gritty of
True/Magnetic north in the sim (probably end up lost in real life though!)
I presume on an active runway you land into the wind like stated, but also
take off into the wind. Does taking off into the wind create more lift
under the wings as I always presumed flying into a headwind would slow you
down but I presume I'm wrong.

--
Ibby (The artist formerly known as Chris)


"Beech45Whiskey" <pjricc@ZZgmail.com> wrote in message
news:3p2d09jwe1fm.dlg@ID-259643.user.individual.net...
quote:

> "Ibby (The Artist Formerly Known as Chris)" <donotemailme@nothere.com>
> wrote:
>
>
> Don't feel silly. I recall having the same confusion when I first started
> my flight training.
>
> As William pointed out, the ATIS is stating winds from their source, as in
> the winds are coming FROM 090 at 10 kts. This will help you to quickly
> visualize the winds in relation to the landing runway, since the objective
> is to land into the wind. (Runway number with a trailing ZERO is within
> ten degrees of its magnetic heading - as in runway 27 is *roughly* on a
> magnetic heading of 270.)
>
> Also worth pointing out is that ATIS-reported winds are *magnetic*
> direction (relative to magnetic north) whereas winds reported in a wind's
> aloft forecast are reported in true heading (relative to true north).
> This
> is done because flight planning begins with all headings first being
> related to true north, then converted to magnetic.
>
> --
> Peter



Jay Beckman

2006-03-15, 7:35 pm

"Ibby (The Artist Formerly Known as Chris)" <donotemailme@nothere.com> wrote
in message news:dv9d1l$o1c$1@nwrdmz03.dmz.ncs.ea.ibs-infra.bt.com...
quote:

> Thanks for that. I have to say I don't get into the nitty gritty of
> True/Magnetic north in the sim (probably end up lost in real life though!)
> I presume on an active runway you land into the wind like stated, but also
> take off into the wind. Does taking off into the wind create more lift
> under the wings as I always presumed flying into a headwind would slow you
> down but I presume I'm wrong.
>
> --
> Ibby (The artist formerly known as Chris)


Taking off into the wind allows you to achieve flying speed sooner. If your
rotation speed is 55kts and you already have 10kts of wind blowing down the
runway and over your wings, then you only need to "make" 45 additional kts
of airspeed (which you'll reach sooner in the takeoff roll thereby
minimizing ground run.)

Landing into the wind simply allows you to maintain a safe flying speed
(airspeed wise) with as slow a relative groundspeed as possible allowing for
the use of as little pavement as practicable.

Jay B


Beech45Whiskey

2006-03-15, 7:35 pm

"Ibby (The Artist Formerly Known as Chris)" <donotemailme@nothere.com>
wrote:
quote:

> Thanks for that. I have to say I don't get into the nitty gritty of
> True/Magnetic north in the sim (probably end up lost in real life though!)


The pole around which the Earth spins and the pole around which the earth's
magnetic field enters and exits the earth are not one and the same
(magnetic north is not in the same physical location as true north up there
in the Artic Circle).

To visualize the difference between true and magnetic north, get yourself a
basketball/racquetteball/baseball/kickball/etc. (but not a football).

Now, draw a dot on the top center of the ball. This represents true north
(which is the pole around which the earth rotates). If the ball is small
enough, hold the ball in your hand and place one finger at that dot at the
top and your thumb on the bottom of the ball. Spin the ball in your grasp
with your other hand and you are simulating a rotating earth.

Just offset of that top-center dot, place another dot (just a little bit
away from the top-center dot, somewhere on the top of the ball but not too
close to the first dot you drew). This represents magnetic north, which is
the pole from where the magnetic field emanates.

Without looking it up at the moment, I forgot which direction the magnetic
field flows, so I don't remember if the field exits the earth at the top or
enters the earth at that point, but this fact is irrelevant here.

With those two dots at the top of the ball, now place a dot at various
points around the ball's "equator." Draw two lines from each of these
dots, one up to the "true north" dot on your ball and the other up to the
"magnetic north" dot you drew.

Notice how some of your "equator" dots have two lines that diverge to their
respective norths? There is the difference between magnetic north and true
north.
quote:

> I presume on an active runway you land into the wind like stated, but also
> take off into the wind.


That is preferable. See below.
quote:

> Does taking off into the wind create more lift
> under the wings as I always presumed flying into a headwind would slow you
> down but I presume I'm wrong.


Taking off or landing into a steady wind reduces your ground roll, or the
distance you need to roll on the runway, before either lifting off or
stopping (depending on what it is you are doing).

Taking off or landing *with the wind* (downwind, as it were) increases your
ground roll. Since runway length is finite, it is preferable and safer to
use as little as possible for either event.

--
Peter
PPS

2006-03-15, 7:35 pm

The only silly question is the one never asked. A lot of people get confused
by this, especially those involved marine forcasts...marine lists it as the
'TO' direction, aviation as has already been explained is 'From'.



"Ibby (The Artist Formerly Known as Chris)" <donotemailme@nothere.com> wrote
in message news:dv9al6$mqi$1@nwrdmz02.dmz.ncs.ea.ibs-infra.bt.com...
quote:

> Please excuse this extremely silly question but can someone clarify if the
> wind direction quoted by ATIS comes from or goes toward the quoted bearing
> i.e. Wind 090 at 10 knots, does this mean the wind is coming from 090 and
> blowing towards 270 or the other way round?
>
> Thanks
>
> --
> Ibby (The artist formerly known as Chris)
>
>
>



Gerbelium

2006-03-15, 7:35 pm

Ibby (The Artist Formerly Known as Chris) wrote:
quote:

> Thanks for that. I have to say I don't get into the nitty gritty of
> True/Magnetic north in the sim (probably end up lost in real life
> though!) I presume on an active runway you land into the wind like
> stated, but also take off into the wind. Does taking off into the
> wind create more lift under the wings as I always presumed flying
> into a headwind would slow you down but I presume I'm wrong.


Taking off into the wind effectively shortens the required length of
runway - ergo makes the endeavour safer.
As conversely, taking off with a tail-wind effectively lengthens it = BAAD !

[vbcol=seagreen]
>
>
> "Beech45Whiskey" <pjricc@ZZgmail.com> wrote in message
> news:3p2d09jwe1fm.dlg@ID-259643.user.individual.net...


stevej

2006-03-15, 7:35 pm

Sometimes a general (ie not metar) weather forecast can be confusing too,
such as 'today there will be a westerly wind' - is that coming from the west
or going to, who knows.

Steve

"PPS" <jgardner@nitroREMOVETHISgraphix.Kom> wrote in message
news:myXRf.12867$C7.9470@bignews2.bellsouth.net...
quote:

> The only silly question is the one never asked. A lot of people get
> confused by this, especially those involved marine forcasts...marine lists
> it as the 'TO' direction, aviation as has already been explained is
> 'From'.
>
>
>
> "Ibby (The Artist Formerly Known as Chris)" <donotemailme@nothere.com>
> wrote in message news:dv9al6$mqi$1@nwrdmz02.dmz.ncs.ea.ibs-infra.bt.com...
>
>



FlyingAxx

2006-03-15, 7:35 pm

stevej wrote:
quote:

> Sometimes a general (ie not metar) weather forecast can be confusing too,
> such as 'today there will be a westerly wind' - is that coming from the west
> or going to, who knows.
>
> Steve
>
> "PPS" <jgardner@nitroREMOVETHISgraphix.Kom> wrote in message
> news:myXRf.12867$C7.9470@bignews2.bellsouth.net...
>
>

It's the direction where you have to point with your nose to smell
your neighbors barbecue best in the summer.
--
Regards
Axel
PPS

2006-03-15, 7:35 pm

In the US, as far as I know, the only 'From' is marine, everything else is
'To', and to this day I have no idea why :-)


"stevej" <nopam@nospam.net> wrote in message
news:quWdnT0iirne2oXZRVnyuA@pipex.net...
quote:

> Sometimes a general (ie not metar) weather forecast can be confusing too,
> such as 'today there will be a westerly wind' - is that coming from the
> west or going to, who knows.
>
> Steve



Beech45Whiskey

2006-03-15, 7:35 pm

PPS <jgardner@nitroREMOVETHISgraphix.Kom> wrote:
quote:

> In the US, as far as I know, the only 'From' is marine, everything else is
> 'To', and to this day I have no idea why :-)


Do you have that backwards, since aviation is a FROM, right? Or have I
lost my way somewhere along this thread?

Additionally, the weather forecasters around my parts (northeast US) assume
FROM when they are stating the forecasted winds.

"We will have a strong southwesterly wind this afternoon as that low
pressure system pulls out of the region."

Looking at the isobars on their prog charts confirms this.

--
Peter
PPS

2006-03-15, 7:35 pm

Ya, I inverted myself...more coffee!


"Beech45Whiskey" <pjricc@ZZgmail.com> wrote in message
news:11j87zwawxa3y.dlg@ID-259643.user.individual.net...
quote:

> PPS <jgardner@nitroREMOVETHISgraphix.Kom> wrote:
>
>
> Do you have that backwards, since aviation is a FROM, right? Or have I
> lost my way somewhere along this thread?
>
> Additionally, the weather forecasters around my parts (northeast US)
> assume
> FROM when they are stating the forecasted winds.
>
> "We will have a strong southwesterly wind this afternoon as that low
> pressure system pulls out of the region."
>
> Looking at the isobars on their prog charts confirms this.
>
> --
> Peter



William

2006-03-15, 7:35 pm

Is that what you call it ? :-)


"PPS" <jgardner@nitroREMOVETHISgraphix.Kom> wrote in message
news:F_XRf.13259$C7.10522@bignews2.bellsouth.net...
quote:

> Ya, I inverted myself...more coffee!
>
>
> "Beech45Whiskey" <pjricc@ZZgmail.com> wrote in message
> news:11j87zwawxa3y.dlg@ID-259643.user.individual.net...
>
>



PPS

2006-03-15, 7:35 pm

Anal/cranial inversion sound better? :-)


"William" <alone@home.com> wrote in message
news:L7YRf.291$xz6.50@bignews1.bellsouth.net...
quote:

> Is that what you call it ? :-)



Ibby \(The Artist Formerly Known as Chris\)

2006-03-15, 7:35 pm

I had always presumed going with the wind increased your ground speed
quicker resulting in lifting off quicker. Now I realise that the crucial
element is in fact airspeed which is increased on takeoff if into a headwind

--
Ibby (The artist formerly known as Chris)


"Gerbelium" <gerbelium@ntlworld.com> wrote in message
news:%BXRf.3632$8g4.580@newsfe7-gui.ntli.net...
quote:

> Ibby (The Artist Formerly Known as Chris) wrote:
>
> Taking off into the wind effectively shortens the required length of
> runway - ergo makes the endeavour safer.
> As conversely, taking off with a tail-wind effectively lengthens it = BAAD
> !
>
>
>
>



Ibby \(The Artist Formerly Known as Chris\)

2006-03-15, 7:35 pm

Thanks Peter,

All sounds rather complicated and I don't know how you guys can work it all
out in the air, must be hard holding the control yoke with one hand and a
marker pen and basketball with the other ;-)

--
Ibby (The artist formerly known as Chris)


"Beech45Whiskey" <pjricc@ZZgmail.com> wrote in message
news:v3jgf41sjf68.dlg@ID-259643.user.individual.net...
quote:

> "Ibby (The Artist Formerly Known as Chris)" <donotemailme@nothere.com>
> wrote:
>
>
> The pole around which the Earth spins and the pole around which the
> earth's
> magnetic field enters and exits the earth are not one and the same
> (magnetic north is not in the same physical location as true north up
> there
> in the Artic Circle).
>
> To visualize the difference between true and magnetic north, get yourself
> a
> basketball/racquetteball/baseball/kickball/etc. (but not a football).
>
> Now, draw a dot on the top center of the ball. This represents true north
> (which is the pole around which the earth rotates). If the ball is small
> enough, hold the ball in your hand and place one finger at that dot at the
> top and your thumb on the bottom of the ball. Spin the ball in your grasp
> with your other hand and you are simulating a rotating earth.
>
> Just offset of that top-center dot, place another dot (just a little bit
> away from the top-center dot, somewhere on the top of the ball but not too
> close to the first dot you drew). This represents magnetic north, which
> is
> the pole from where the magnetic field emanates.
>
> Without looking it up at the moment, I forgot which direction the magnetic
> field flows, so I don't remember if the field exits the earth at the top
> or
> enters the earth at that point, but this fact is irrelevant here.
>
> With those two dots at the top of the ball, now place a dot at various
> points around the ball's "equator." Draw two lines from each of these
> dots, one up to the "true north" dot on your ball and the other up to the
> "magnetic north" dot you drew.
>
> Notice how some of your "equator" dots have two lines that diverge to
> their
> respective norths? There is the difference between magnetic north and
> true
> north.
>
>
> That is preferable. See below.
>
>
> Taking off or landing into a steady wind reduces your ground roll, or the
> distance you need to roll on the runway, before either lifting off or
> stopping (depending on what it is you are doing).
>
> Taking off or landing *with the wind* (downwind, as it were) increases
> your
> ground roll. Since runway length is finite, it is preferable and safer to
> use as little as possible for either event.
>
> --
> Peter



Ibby \(The Artist Formerly Known as Chris\)

2006-03-15, 7:35 pm

I'm vegetarian so I would probably face the other way!

--
Ibby (The artist formerly known as Chris)


quote:

> It's the direction where you have to point with your nose to smell your
> neighbors barbecue best in the summer.
> --
> Regards
> Axel



Ibby \(The Artist Formerly Known as Chris\)

2006-03-15, 7:35 pm

Cue Abbot and Costello!
Who's on what base?

--
Ibby (The artist formerly known as Chris)
quote:

>
> Do you have that backwards, since aviation is a FROM, right? Or have I
> lost my way somewhere along this thread?


quote:

> Peter



Ibby \(The Artist Formerly Known as Chris\)

2006-03-15, 7:35 pm

'Arse about Face' is what we call it!

--
Ibby (The artist formerly known as Chris)


"PPS" <jgardner@nitroREMOVETHISgraphix.Kom> wrote in message
news:PdYRf.13464$C7.6477@bignews2.bellsouth.net...
quote:

> Anal/cranial inversion sound better? :-)
>
>
> "William" <alone@home.com> wrote in message
> news:L7YRf.291$xz6.50@bignews1.bellsouth.net...
>
>



PPS

2006-03-15, 7:35 pm

Abbot and Costello???? Cue Aiplane and get me a vector Victor!


"Ibby (The Artist Formerly Known as Chris)" <donotemailme@nothere.com> wrote
in message news:dv9jik$6mk$1@nwrdmz01.dmz.ncs.ea.ibs-infra.bt.com...
quote:

> Cue Abbot and Costello!
> Who's on what base?
>
> --
> Ibby (The artist formerly known as Chris)
>
>
>
>
>



William

2006-03-15, 7:35 pm

I was thinking more about the coffee part :-)

"PPS" <jgardner@nitroREMOVETHISgraphix.Kom> wrote in message
news:PdYRf.13464$C7.6477@bignews2.bellsouth.net...
quote:

> Anal/cranial inversion sound better? :-)
>
>
> "William" <alone@home.com> wrote in message
> news:L7YRf.291$xz6.50@bignews1.bellsouth.net...
>
>



PPS

2006-03-15, 7:35 pm

Caffiene, nicotine, sugar, the 3 basic food groups, never post without
plenty of each :-)

Rememeber....
"You can only tie the record for the lowest altitude"



"William" <alone@home.com> wrote in message
news:xCYRf.294$xz6.138@bignews1.bellsouth.net...
quote:

>I was thinking more about the coffee part :-)
>



Beech45Whiskey

2006-03-15, 7:35 pm

PPS <jgardner@nitroREMOVETHISgraphix.Kom> wrote:
quote:

> Caffiene, nicotine, sugar, the 3 basic food groups, never post without
> plenty of each :-)


Many here would include the forth basic food group, too: Alcohol.

--
Peter
Jay Beckman

2006-03-15, 7:35 pm

"PPS" <jgardner@nitroREMOVETHISgraphix.Kom> wrote in message
news:PdYRf.13464$C7.6477@bignews2.bellsouth.net...
quote:

> Anal/cranial inversion sound better? :-)
>
>


Optical Rectumitus is another way to put it...

Jay B


FlyingAxx

2006-03-15, 7:35 pm

Ibby (The Artist Formerly Known as Chris) wrote:
quote:

> I'm vegetarian so I would probably face the other way!
>

LOL
--
Regards
Axel
Tom Orle

2006-03-15, 7:35 pm

Beech45Whiskey <pjricc@ZZgmail.com> wrote:
quote:

>Additionally, the weather forecasters around my parts (northeast US) assume
>FROM when they are stating the forecasted winds.


When starting to fly, I always had a problem with the barbs on the
surfacewinds charts.

Logic told me that if that barb were a flag (because that's what they
reminded me of), it would point in the direction the wind is blowing,
not where it came from.

-=tom=-

Beech45Whiskey

2006-03-15, 7:35 pm

Tom Orle <xspam.torle@comcast.net> wrote:
quote:

> Logic told me that if that barb were a flag (because that's what they
> reminded me of), it would point in the direction the wind is blowing,
> not where it came from.


Sometimes you are too smart for your own good. ;-)

--
Peter
Ibby \(The Artist Formerly Known as Chris\)

2006-03-15, 7:35 pm

Roger, Over and Dunn Ehh!

--
Ibby (The artist formerly known as Chris)

Cue Aiplane and get me a vector Victor!
quote:

>
>



RandyL

2006-03-15, 11:32 pm

Ibby,
The wind direction is always given FROM the direction mentioned. For
instance "Wind 090 at 10 knots" means that the wind is blowing FROM 090
degrees magnetic, at 10 knots. Hope this helps...

Randy L.
--
"When making an emergency off-field landing at night, turn
on the landing lights just prior to touchdown. If you don't
like what you see, then turn off the landing lights."


"Ibby (The Artist Formerly Known as Chris)" <donotemailme@nothere.com> wrote
in message news:dv9al6$mqi$1@nwrdmz02.dmz.ncs.ea.ibs-infra.bt.com...
quote:

> Please excuse this extremely silly question but can someone clarify if the
> wind direction quoted by ATIS comes from or goes toward the quoted bearing
> i.e. Wind 090 at 10 knots, does this mean the wind is coming from 090 and
> blowing towards 270 or the other way round?
>
> Thanks
>
> --
> Ibby (The artist formerly known as Chris)
>
>
>



stevej

2006-03-16, 5:34 am


"Beech45Whiskey" >
, get yourself a
quote:

> basketball/racquetteball/baseball/kickball/etc. (but not a football).


Don't you like football Peter, it's the World Cup this you know! Rumour has
it that the USA team aren't at all bad. At least they are kicking the ball
now instead of picking it up and running off with it ;-)


Beech45Whiskey

2006-03-16, 7:34 pm

stevej <nopam@nospam.net> wrote:
quote:

> Don't you like football Peter, it's the World Cup this you know! Rumour has
> it that the USA team aren't at all bad. At least they are kicking the ball
> now instead of picking it up and running off with it ;-)


Ahhh, very good! I forgot, for the briefest of moments, the global meaning
of football.

--
Peter
Copyright 2003 - 2009 gamesreviews.net Software forum  PC Hardware reviews